civil · Ashland division · 0:26-cv-00033
Parks v. Runyon
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, filed Feb. 2, 2026.
- Docket number
- 0:26-cv-00033
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky — Ashland
- Date filed
- Feb. 2, 2026
- Assigned to
- David L. Bunning
- Referred to
- P. So
- Nature of suit
- 555 Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
- Cause
- 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Records
- CourtListener / RECAP (free) · PACER (login, fees)
Parties (as listed)
- Donald Mauk
- Timothy Runyon
- Jerry Smith
- Jay London Parks
Party roles (plaintiff/defendant) are not exposed by the mirror; names are listed as they appear on the docket.
Recent docket entries
| Date | # | Entry |
|---|---|---|
| Feb. 2, 2026 | 3 | Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jay London Parks, pro se. (HAH) (Entered: 02/02/2026) |
| Feb. 2, 2026 | 2 | MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jay London Parks, pro se. Motions referred to PSO. (HAH) (Entered: 02/02/2026) |
| Feb. 2, 2026 | 1 | COMPLAINT 3 summons(es) presented referred to PSO, filed by Jay London Parks, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit 1 - UK Healthcare Docs, # 3 Exhibit 2 - UK Healthcare Docs, # 4 Exhibit 3 - Disciplinary Report Form Part 1, # 5 Exhibit 4 - Disciplinary Report Form Part 2, # 6 Exhibit 5 - Adjustment Committee Appeal Form, # 7 Exhibit 6 - UK Healthcare Docs, # 8 Exhibit 7 - Wellpath Docs, # 9 Exhibit 8 - UK Healthcare Docs, # 10 Exhibit 9 -UK Healthcare Docs, # 11 Exhibit 10 - UK Healthcare Docs, # 12 Exhibit 11 - Inmate Grievance Form, # 13 Exhibit 12 - Grievance Rejection Form, # 14 Exhibit 13 - Letter, # 15 Exhibit 14 - Letter Response, # 16 Exhibit 15 - Memorandum Letters, # 17 Exhibit 16 - Letter, # 18 Exhibit 17 - Request to Inspect Public Records, # 19 Proposed Summons to Runyon, # 20 Proposed Summons to Mauk, # 21 Proposed Summons to Smith, # 22 Env not PM)(HAH) (Entered: 02/02/2026) |
A complaint or indictment is an allegation. Nothing here is a finding of liability or guilt unless a docket entry says the court entered one.