Lexington Records

civil · Covington division · 2:26-cv-00172

Singh v. Lyons

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, filed April 20, 2026.

Docket number
2:26-cv-00172
Court
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky — Covington
Date filed
April 20, 2026
Assigned to
David L. Bunning
Nature of suit
463 Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jurisdiction
U.S. Government Defendant
Jury demand
None
Records
CourtListener / RECAP (free) · PACER (login, fees)

Parties (as listed)

Party roles (plaintiff/defendant) are not exposed by the mirror; names are listed as they appear on the docket.

Recent docket entries

Date#Entry
May 12, 20268MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Singh's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is GRANTED; (2) Respondents are ORDERED to immediately release Petitioner, or in the alternative, provide him with a constitutionally adequate bond hearing where the government bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within seven (7) days of the date of this Order; and (3) Respondents shall file a Status Report with this Court on or before May 26, 2026 to certify compliance with this Order. The Status Report shall include when the bond hearing occurred, if bond was granted or denied, and if denied, the reasons for that denial. Signed by Chief District Judge David L Bunning on 5/12/2026.(TDB)cc: COR
April 20, 20261PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number BKYEDC-6355438.), filed by Jaspreet Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(TDB) (Entered: 04/20/2026)
April 20, 2026BAR STATUS Check completed as to Diana Rubin re 2 MOTION for Diana Rubin to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jaspreet Singh. (TDB)

A complaint or indictment is an allegation. Nothing here is a finding of liability or guilt unless a docket entry says the court entered one.

Source: CourtListener v4 search API (anonymous), retrieved Sept. 12, 2026. Docket data is mirrored from the RECAP archive and may lag PACER; filings are allegations, not findings, until a court rules.