Lexington Records

civil · Lexington division · 5:25-cv-00294

Chapa v. CEO of Aramark

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, filed Aug. 20, 2025.

Docket number
5:25-cv-00294
Court
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky — Lexington
Date filed
Aug. 20, 2025
Assigned to
Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of suit
Civil Rights: Other
Cause
28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Records
CourtListener / RECAP (free) · PACER (login, fees)

Parties (as listed)

Party roles (plaintiff/defendant) are not exposed by the mirror; names are listed as they appear on the docket.

Recent docket entries

Date#Entry
June 25, 202610ORDER: (1) Magistrate Judge Stinnett's 9 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion; (2) this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and (3) a Judgment consistent with this Order and the Report and Recommendation will be entered. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 6/25/2026.(STC)cc: COR and Gregory Ricardo Chapa by US Mail
Feb. 18, 20266MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The clerk shall send Pro se Form 1/instructions together with a copy of this Order to both Pla's address of record and the address provided in Pla's December filing (Seminole, FL).Pla shall file the Prose 1 Form w/in 30 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett on 02/18/2026. (DC) cc: COR and Gregory Ricardo Chapa by US Mail (Form + Order - Both addresses)

A complaint or indictment is an allegation. Nothing here is a finding of liability or guilt unless a docket entry says the court entered one.

Source: CourtListener v4 search API (anonymous), retrieved Sept. 12, 2026. Docket data is mirrored from the RECAP archive and may lag PACER; filings are allegations, not findings, until a court rules.