Lexington Records

criminal · Lexington division · 5:26-cr-00007

United States v. Puckett

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, filed March 5, 2026.

Docket number
5:26-cr-00007
Court
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky — Lexington
Date filed
March 5, 2026
Assigned to
Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of suit
—
Cause
—
Records
CourtListener / RECAP (free) · PACER (login, fees)

Parties (as listed)

Party roles (plaintiff/defendant) are not exposed by the mirror; names are listed as they appear on the docket.

Recent docket entries

Date#Entry
Jan. 26, 20263ORDER as to Nicholas Kyle Puckett: 1. The Motion of the US for arraignment 1 and the Motion of the US for a WHCAP 2 are GRANTED; 2. The warden of Three Forks Regional Jail shall DELIVER the Defendant to the USM for EDKY; 3. The Marshall shall DELIVER PUCKETT in custody before the US District Court for ARRAIGNMENT set for 3/5/2026 at 10:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Judge Karen K. Caldwell, and from time to time thereafter until his case is disposed of; 4. The Marshal shall safely KEEP PUCKETT in custody until he is no longer needed, at which time the Marshall shall RETURN PUCKETT to the custody of the warden; and 5. The Clerk SHALL FORWARD copies of this order to the USM (certified) and to the USPO. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/26/2026. (KMP) cc: COR,USM (certified),USP Modified hearing on 1/26/2026 (KMP). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/26/2026: # 1 Receipt) (KMP). (Entered: 01/26/2026)
Jan. 23, 20262MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by USA as to Nicholas Kyle Puckett. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (STC) (Entered: 01/23/2026)
Jan. 23, 20261NOTICE of INTENT to file Information and MOTION for Arraignment by USA as to Nicholas Kyle Puckett. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (STC) (Entered: 01/23/2026)

A complaint or indictment is an allegation. Nothing here is a finding of liability or guilt unless a docket entry says the court entered one.

Source: CourtListener v4 search API (anonymous), retrieved Sept. 12, 2026. Docket data is mirrored from the RECAP archive and may lag PACER; filings are allegations, not findings, until a court rules.