Lexington Records

civil · Lexington division · 5:26-cv-00051

Chenault v. AT&T, Inc.

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, filed Feb. 17, 2026.

Docket number
5:26-cv-00051
Court
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky — Lexington
Date filed
Feb. 17, 2026
Assigned to
Gregory F. Vantatenhove
Referred to
P. So
Nature of suit
485 Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause
47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury demand
Plaintiff
Records
CourtListener / RECAP (free) · PACER (login, fees)

Parties (as listed)

Party roles (plaintiff/defendant) are not exposed by the mirror; names are listed as they appear on the docket.

Recent docket entries

Date#Entry
Feb. 17, 20264MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cory L. Chenault, Sr, pro se. Motions referred to PSO. (JDS) (Entered: 02/17/2026)
Feb. 17, 20263IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: # 1 Sample Caption)(JDS) (Entered: 02/17/2026)
Feb. 17, 20261COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED), filed by Cory L. Chenault, Sr, Pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Email Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement)(JDS) (Entered: 02/17/2026)

A complaint or indictment is an allegation. Nothing here is a finding of liability or guilt unless a docket entry says the court entered one.

Source: CourtListener v4 search API (anonymous), retrieved Sept. 12, 2026. Docket data is mirrored from the RECAP archive and may lag PACER; filings are allegations, not findings, until a court rules.