civil · London division · 6:26-cv-00103
Parmley v. Crabtree
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, filed March 5, 2026.
- Docket number
- 6:26-cv-00103
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky — London
- Date filed
- March 5, 2026
- Assigned to
- Claria Horn Boom
- Referred to
- Hanly A. Ingram
- Nature of suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
- Cause
- 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Both
- Records
- CourtListener / RECAP (free) · PACER (login, fees)
Parties (as listed)
- Savannah Parmley
- Cody King
- Robert Baugh
- Gregory Guffey
- Logan Crabtree
- Nick Taylor
- Noah Dishman
- Joshua Denham
- Jacob Loudermilk
- McKenzie Helton
Party roles (plaintiff/defendant) are not exposed by the mirror; names are listed as they appear on the docket.
Recent docket entries
| Date | # | Entry |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2026 | 15 | ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) Within 21 days, the parties, by counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to consider the topics Rule 26(f) (2) mandates. (2) Within 14 days of the meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report containing: see a-e. (3) If the parties propose a deadline for dispositive motions to be filed that is more than one (1) year from the date the joint status report required by paragraph (2) is filed, they SHALL specifically describe the basis for the length of their proposed schedule with sufficient detail for the Court to assess that schedule and its progression, including in particular the discovery and dispositive motions deadlines. If such basis and detail is not provided, the Court will shorten the timeline provided by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 3/27/2026.(JCP)cc: COR (Entered: 03/27/2026) |
| March 27, 2026 | ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Ingram for review: 14 Answer to Complaint (JCP) | |
| March 26, 2026 | 14 | ANSWER to 1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Logan Crabtree, Noah Dishman.(Williams, Jason) (Entered: 03/26/2026) |
A complaint or indictment is an allegation. Nothing here is a finding of liability or guilt unless a docket entry says the court entered one.